Students who violate Western’s Sexual Misconduct Policy or the Board of Trustees Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment, section 3.5, will be subject to the conduct procedures detailed below. Alleged violations that fall outside the Sexual Misconduct Policy and/or the Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment but happen concurrently with violations of those stated policies shall be pursued together through the Sexual Misconduct Procedure.
Reporting of Alleged Sexual Misconduct/Sexual Harassment
At any time, any person may report sex discrimination, including sexual misconduct and sexual harassment (whether or not the person reporting is the person alleged to be the victim of sex discrimination), in person, by mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail to the Title IX Coordinator, or by any other means that results in the Title IX Coordinator receiving a verbal or written report.
Submit a report here.
Any Responsible Employee who receives a report of alleged sexual misconduct/sexual harassment must promptly report the alleged sexual misconduct/sexual harassment to the Title IX Coordinator.
Upon receiving a report, the Title IX Coordinator will:
- Inform the Complainant of the method for filing a Formal Complaint.
- Inform the Complainant of the availability of Supportive Measures with or without filing a formal complaint.
- Offer Supportive Measures to the Complainant, the Respondent, or both as detailed below.
Supportive Measures
The Title IX Coordinator will ensure that Supportive Measures are offered to the Complainant and/or Respondent as appropriate, as reasonably available, and without fee or charge to the Complainant or the Respondent. Supportive Measures may be offered before or after the filing of a Formal Complaint, or where no Formal Complaint has been filed.
The purpose of Supportive Measures is to restore or preserve equal access to Western’s education programs or activities without unreasonably burdening the other Party. Supportive Measures include measures designed to protect the safety of all parties or Western’s educational environment, as well as measures designed to deter sexual misconduct/sexual harassment.
Supportive Measures may include, but are not limited to:
- Counseling
- Extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments
- Modifications of work or class schedules
- Campus escort services
- Mutual restrictions on contact between the Parties
- Changes in work or housing locations
- Leaves of absence
- Increased security and monitoring of certain areas of campus
- Other similar measures
Supportive Measures do not include disciplinary sanctions. The Formal Resolution Process must be completed before disciplinary sanctions may be imposed on a Respondent.
Western may issue an interim suspension or a PNG from campus on an emergency basis if the Title IX Coordinator in collaboration with the Behavioral Intervention Team:
- Undertakes an individualized safety and risk analysis;
- Determines that an immediate threat to physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of sexual misconduct/sexual harassment justifies removal; and
- Provides the Respondent with notice and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the suspension or PNG.
Western may place a non-student employee Respondent on administrative leave during the pendency of the Formal Resolution Process set forth below.
Western will maintain as confidential any Supportive Measures provided to the Complainant or Respondent, to the extent that maintaining such confidentiality would not impair the ability of Western to provide Supportive Measures.
The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for coordinating the effective implementation of supportive measures.
Fair and Equitable Process
Western will insure a fair and equitable process for both Parties in a Sexual Misconduct investigation. If at any point either Party feels the process is no longer fair or equitable, that Party is encouraged to reach out to the Title IX Coordinator immediately to remedy those concerns.
Western will ensure a fair and equitable process through the following steps:
- No individual designated as a Title IX Coordinator, Deputy Title IX Coordinator, Investigator, Decision-Maker, Appeal Decision-Maker, or person designated to facilitate an informal resolution process may have a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally or an individual Complainant or Respondent.
- Western will not make credibility determinations based on a person’s status as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness.
- A Respondent is presumed not responsible for alleged conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the Formal Resolution Process.
- Throughout the processes described herein, Western will objectively evaluate all relevant evidence, including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence.
- The processes described herein are subject to the State of Colorado suggested timeframes of 60-90 days to complete an investigation of a case. These timeframes may be extended for good cause upon written notice to the Parties setting forth reason for such extension. Good cause may include considerations such as the absence of a Party, a Party’s advisor, or a witness; concurrent law enforcement activity; or the need for language assistance or accommodation of disabilities.
Formal Complaint
A Formal Complaint may be filed by a Complainant or by the Title IX Coordinator.
A Formal Complaint may be brought to the attention of the Title IX Coordinator by contacting:
Emma Hempel
(650) 383-4753
tixadministrator@western.edu
Western will investigate the allegations in a Formal Complaint.
Written Notice
Upon receipt of a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Coordinator will issue written notice of allegations to the Respondent and Complainant, if known. Written notice will be provided to each Party within five (5) days of receiving the Formal Complaint. The notice of allegations will include:
- Notice of this policy and the processes within this policy, including the Informal Resolution Process described below;
- The identities of the Parties involved, if known;
- The conduct allegedly constituting sexual misconduct/sexual harassment;
- The date and location of the incident, if known;
- A statement that the Respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct;
- A statement that a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of a Formal Resolution Process;
- A statement that Parties may have an advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney;
- A statement that Parties may inspect and review evidence;
- A statement that retaliation is prohibited and will not be tolerated.
If, during an investigation, Western decides to investigate additional allegations about the Complainant or Respondent relating to the same facts or circumstances but not include in the earlier written notice, Western will provide notice of the additional allegations to the Parties whose identities are known.
Dismissal
The Title IX Coordinator will dismiss a Formal Complaint from a Title IX investigation, but may pursue the allegations under the Sexual Misconduct Prohibition Policy, if:
- The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint would not constitute Sexual Harassment under Title IX regulations described in the Board of Trustees Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment; or
- The conduct alleged in the Formal Complaint did not occur within the jurisdiction/applicability of the Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment.
While part of a Formal Complaint may be dismissed under Title IX Regulation, student safety is a priority and sexual misconduct which falls outside the Title IX definition of sexual harassment may be addressed through the processes identified below.
Informal Resolution Process
A complainant who wishes to file a complaint with the Title IX Coordinator, but who does not wish to pursue a Formal Conduct process may request a less formal proceeding know as an Informal Resolution Process. Although informal, this is an official conduct process. The Informal Resolution Process could include, but is not limited to, restorative justice, mediation, dialogue facilitation, and/or any process that does not involve a full investigation and adjudication.
In order to pursue an Informal Resolution Process, the Complainant must choose to utilize this process and the Respondent must agree to engage in the Informal Resolution Process.
A. Availability of Informal Resolution Process
The Informal Resolution Process will not be available to parties who do not agree to pursue such a process.
The Title IX Coordinator may offer the Informal Resolution Process to the parties with the following conditions:
- The Informal Resolution Process is only available after a Formal Complaint is filed and only if all Parties voluntarily consent, in writing, to the Informal Resolution Process.
- Any time prior to agreeing to a resolution, any Party has the right to withdraw from the Informal Resolution Process and resume the Formal Process described below.
- The Informal Resolution Process may be implemented any time prior to reaching a determination regarding responsibility if the above conditions are met.
B. Notice of Availability of Informal Resolution Process
If the Informal Resolution Process is available, the Title IX Coordinator will issue written notice to the parties disclosing:
- The allegations;
- The requirements of the informal resolution process, including the circumstances under which it precludes the Parties from resuming a Formal Complaint arising from the same allegations;
- Any consequences resulting from participating in the Informal Resolution Process, including the records that will be maintained or could be shared;
- That either Party may withdraw from the Informal Resolution Process and resume the formal grievance process prior to agreeing to a resolution.
C. Timeframe
Western will make a good faith effort to complete the Informal Resolution Process within an average of sixty to ninety days, without jeopardizing the rights of a Party. After the parties have agreed to a resolution that is accepted by the Title IX Coordinator, neither Party may appeal the resolution.
Formal Resolution Process
A Complainant or Title IX Coordinator may choose to pursue a Formal Resolution Process if an Informal Resolution Process is deemed inappropriate for the specific case details or the level of the violation warrants a formal intervention.
i. Consolidation
The Title IX Coordinator may consolidate Formal Complaints as to allegations of sexual misconduct/sexual harassment where the allegations of sexual misconduct/sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
ii. Advisor
Each party has the right to have an advisor of their choice but Parties are not required to have an advisor. The advisor may be, but need not be, an attorney. The advisor may be present at any proceedings that are part of the formal resolution process. If a Party wishes to have an advisor present at a proceeding, Western will work within reason to schedule the proceeding so the advisor may attend without unreasonably delaying the progress of the formal resolution process.
Except as described below in the section on “Hearing”, a Party’s advisor may not speak on behalf of the Party and will be expected to follow Western’s Rules of Decorum for the Hearing.
iii. Investigation
- Western will investigate the allegations in a Formal Complaint.
- Western, and not the Complainant or the Respondent, has the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination
- Western cannot access, consider, disclose, or otherwise use a Party’s records that are made or maintained by a health care professional acting in his or her professional capacity, and which are made or maintained in connection with the provision of treatment to the Party, unless Western obtains that Party’s voluntary written consent to do so for the resolution process.
- Investigative Process:
- During the investigation, each Party has an opportunity to present witnesses and evidence to the investigator.
- The investigator will provide written notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of the investigative interview or other meeting to any Party whose participation is invited or expected.
- Prior to conclusion of the investigation, the investigator will send to each Party and to each Party’s advisor, if any, all evidence obtained as party of the investigation, whether or not Western intends to rely on such evidence in reaching a determination regarding responsibility, that is directly related to the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint.
- Each Party may submit a written response, which the investigator will consider prior to conclusion of the investigation and completion of the investigative report.
- The written response, if any, must be submitted to the investigator by the deadline designated by the investigator, which will be at least ten days after the investigator send the evidence to the Party.
- The investigator will create an investigative report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence.
- The investigator must conduct an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence, including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence.
- At least ten days prior to the scheduled hearing, the Title IX Coordinator will send to each Party and to each Party’s advisor, if any, the investigative report.
- Each Party may submit a written response, which the Title IX Coordinator will submit to the Decision-Maker for consideration at the hearing.
- The written response, if any, must be submitted to the Title IX Coordinator by the deadline designated by the Title IX Coordinator.
iv. Hearing
After the conclusion of the investigation, the Title IX Coordinator will refer the case to a panel of up to three faculty and staff members from around campus, herein referred to as the Decision-Maker. The Decision-Maker will conduct a live, virtual hearing.
- Prior to the hearing, the Decision-Maker will review the investigative report and the written responses provided by the Parties, if any.
- The hearing will occur live and virtual via Zoom to allow participants to simultaneously see and hear the Party or witness answering questions.
- Hearings will be recorded. Audio recordings and/or transcripts will be available to the Parties for inspection and review.
- Standard of Evidence
- The determination of responsibility will be made by the Decision-Maker using the preponderance of the evidence standard.
- The preponderance of the evidence is defined as just enough testimony and information to make it more likely than not that the fact sought to be proven is true. This preponderance is based on the more convincing information and its probable truth or accuracy, and not on the amount of information.
- Relevant Evidence
In making a determination of responsibility or sanctions, the Decision-Maker may only consider relevant evidence. Relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determinations to be made more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. The Decision-Maker will not consider:
- Evidence about the Complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior, except when offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged by the Complainant or evidence concerning specific incidents of the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent when offered to prove consent.
- Information protected under a legally recognized privilege, unless the person holding such privilege has waived the privilege.
The Decision-Maker must conduct an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence, including both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence. Credibility determinations may not be based on a person’s status as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness.
- Witness Examination
The Decision-Maker will allow each Party’s advisor to examine witnesses. Cross examination may not be conducted by either Party. Cross examination may only be conducted by an advisor acting on a Party’s behalf.
- Western will provide an advisor to support each Party through the hearing and cross examination, free of charge, for the limited purpose of conducting cross examination.
- Only relevant cross-examination questions may be asked of a Party or witness. Before a Party or witness answers a question, the Decision-Maker will determine whether the question is relevant and explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant.
Remedies/Sanctions
Remedies/sanctions are designed to restore or preserve equal access to Western’s education programs or activities. Remedies/sanctions may be disciplinary or punitive and need to avoid burdening the Respondent. The Decision-Maker is responsible for identifying and recommending appropriate sanctions. The Title IX Coordinator is responsible for accepting the remedies/sanctions recommendations and the effective implementation of remedies/sanctions.
The Decision-Maker will base the recommended remedies/sanctions on Western’s core values of student development and education. If a Respondent is found responsible for sexual misconduct/sexual harassment under this procedure, potential sanctions include:
- Educational/Service Projects – Students found responsible for misconduct must perform educational programs for Residence Halls, sports teams, classes, etc. and/or campus or community service projects aimed at establishing an understanding of the harm caused to the community.
- Conduct Fines – Students may be assessed fines for incidents involving damage to property or communal spaces. Relevant fines may be assessed to groups of students as well in cases which warrant generally assigned responsibility. An example of such would be charging an entire floor for vandalism committed by an unidentified person. Fines collected for conduct violations are used by the Office of Student Affairs to provide ongoing prevention education, wellness, and training opportunities.
- Screening Brief Intervention Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) – SBIRT is an evidence based approach to screening for substance abuse. When risky substance use is identified, students receive a brief intervention —a conversation designed to move an individual to change and reduce substance use. SBIRT is a typical sanction for substance violations. There may be a fee associated with this sanction to provide the assessment and follow up materials and will be the student’s responsibility to cover.
- Substance Abuse Treatment Recommendations and Referrals – Conduct Administrators may recommend substance abuse treatment, classes and awareness programs to students who are found responsible for substance use violations. There may be a fee associated with this sanction and will be the student’s responsibility to cover.
- Parental Notification – In accordance with the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), Western Colorado University utilizes and encourages a partnership with parents whose students experience difficulties related to substance use. Notifications may be made by written letter or telephone conversation. Students are encouraged to notify parents prior to or in conjunction with the Conduct Administrators’ notification.
Strengths Probation – Western administers evidence based Strengths processes in a variety of ways and situations. Strengths use in conduct is used two fold. First to assist students in discovering and using their identified strengths towards personal growth and identifying conduct that may interfere with the students future goals. Secondly strengths discussion groups are used with a group of student to encourage social growth, civil discourse, citizenship and future planning as a student. A conduct violation during the Strengths Probation will result in being placed in a Tier 3 violation level and a mandatory fine equivalent to the highest possible fine for the violation. There is a mandatory $10.00 administration fee associated with this sanction and will be the student’s responsibility to cover.
- Restitution – The Conduct Administrators may assign restitution as a condition for continued good standing. Such action is appropriate in any case in which the misconduct or violation has caused loss of or damage to property or injury to a person, or in which reparation for a particular act of misconduct may reasonably be made by payment of money or the performance of services. A student will be notified in writing of any restitution penalty assessed. Restitution applies to University owned property, and may apply to restitution for damages and loss of private personal property.
- Residence Life Probation – The Conduct Administrators may place a student on Residence Life Probation after having a conduct meeting in which procedural due process is afforded. Students on probation who violate policies may be subject to eviction from the residence halls/apartments. Residence Life Probation shall be for such a designated period and subject to such terms and conditions as the conduct authority imposing it shall designate. A student will be notified in writing of the probation issued.
- Eviction from the Residence Halls or Apartments – Western reserves the right to move a student to another residence hall, apartment complex or room; or suspend, or evict or ban a student from the residence halls/apartments if a student is involved in a serious violation of University rules/policies or repeatedly violates University rules/policies (this eviction may or may not follow a time of housing probation). Once a student is evicted from a residence hall or apartment complex, they will be considered Persona Non-Grata (see below), that is unwelcome, in any on-campus residence hall or apartment complex. Failure to comply with this status will be considered trespassing and treated as such.
- Persona Non-Grata (PNG) – Western reserves the right to deny access, or treat as unwelcome, to the University campus and/or its facilities to anyone, including non-students, who do not comply with campus policy or if there is a perceived threat to campus safety and security. Failure to comply with this status will be considered trespassing and may result in Law Enforcement being notified.
- Avoidance of Contact Directive – The Avoidance of Contact Directive may be set in place to clearly define behavioral expectations between individuals and to provide a sense of safety and security for all involved. Restrictions may include, but are not limited to, walking path restrictions, classroom seating restrictions, specific times to use campus facilities, reassignment of Residential Life living arrangements, etc. Avoidance of Contact Directives are given to all parties involved in any type misconduct, including sexual harassment. The directive is not meant to assign blame or responsibility, but to keep all parties safe and provide an equitable resolution process.
- Conduct Probation – The Conduct Administrators may place a student on conduct probation after having a conduct meeting in which procedural due process is afforded. Conduct probation shall be a final period of trial. Students on probation who violate policies may be subject to suspension or expulsion. Conduct probation shall be for such period and subject to such terms and conditions as the conduct authority imposing it shall designate. A student will be notified in writing of the probation issued. Conduct probation is generally the final conduct action prior to conduct suspension or expulsion. Students on Conduct Probation are required to complete all additional sanctions assigned and meet with their Conduct Officer at least monthly while on Conduct Probation.
- Conduct Suspension – The Conduct Administrator or such member(s) of the University staff as appointed by the Office of Student Affairs, in consultation with the Dean of Students, may suspend a student from the University after having a conduct meeting in which procedural due process is afforded. Conduct suspension is normally for a stated period of time at the end of which a student may apply for readmission. Suspension for an indefinite period may be stipulated, usually with the implication that a student must fulfill certain requirements before re-admission will be considered. While under suspension, the student is not entitled to attend classes regardless of how they are conducted, use University facilities, participate in University activities, or be employed by the University. A student will be notified in writing of any suspension penalty assessed. A conduct suspension penalty may become a part of the student’s academic, personal and/or conduct record.
- Expulsion – Conduct administrators or such member(s) of the University staff, as appointed by the Office of Student Affairs, in consultation with the Dean of Students, may expel a student from the University after having a conduct meeting in which procedural due process is afforded. Expulsion is permanent dismissal from the University without access to re-apply for admission. A student will be notified in writing of any expulsion sanction assessed. An expulsion penalty may become a part of the student’s academic, personal and/or conduct record.
Written Determination
After considering the investigative report, including any Party’s written response to the investigative report, and all relevant evidence presented at the hearing, the Decision will issue a written determination within ten (10) days of the hearing. The Title IX Coordinator will provide the written determination simultaneously to the Parties.
The written determination will include:
- Identification of the allegations constituting sexual misconduct/sexual harassment;
- A description of the procedural steps from the receipt of the Formal Complaint through the determination, including any notifications to the Parties, interviews, site visits, methods used to gather other evidence and hearings held;
- Findings of fact supporting the determination;
- Conclusions regarding the application of the Sexual Misconduct Prohibition Policy and Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment;
- A statement of, and rationale for, the result as to each allegations, including;
- A determination regarding responsibility;
- Any disciplinary sanctions imposed on the Respondent;
- Remedies provided to the Complainant;
- Procedures and permissible bases for the Parties to appeal.
- The written determination becomes final five (5) days after it is sent to the Parties, unless an appeal is filed.
Appeal
Either Party may appeal:
- Dismissal of a Formal Complaint or any allegations therein; or
- A determination regarding responsibility.
No other issue may be appealed.
A. Bases for appeal:
A Party may only appeal on one or more of the following bases:
- Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter;
- New evidence that was not reasonable available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter
This basis for appeal is not satisfied simply because evidence was not presented during the proceedings, if the evidence was reasonable available at the time the determination was made.
- The Title IX Coordinator, investigator, or Decision-Maker had a conflict of interest or bias for or against Complainants or Respondents generally, or the individual Complainant or Respondent, that affected the outcome of the matter.
B. Filing an Appeal
If a Party wishes to file an appeal, the Party must complete the Student Conduct Appeal Form found on the Community Standards and Student Conduct webpage or by contacting the Title IX Coordinator to request the form. The Student Conduct Appeal Form must be submitted no later than five (5) days after the notice of dismissal or written determination is sent to the Party.
The written appeal must state with specificity:
- The issues being appealed; and
- The bases for the appeal.
Incomplete Student Conduct Appeal Forms will not be accepted.
C. Timeframe
Western will make a good faith effort to complete the appeal within five (5) days. The timeframe for completion may be extended for good cause. If the timeframe for completion of appeal is extended, the Title IX Coordinator will notify both Parties in writing of the delay or extension and the reasons for the delay or extension.
D. Appeal Procedure
- After receiving a timely written appeal, the Title IX Coordinator will notify the Parties in writing:
- That the appeal was filed;
- The process for submitting a written statement in support of, or challenging, the issues being appeals.
- The appeal, including any written statements submitted by the Parties, will be considered by the Appeal Decision-Maker. The Appeal Decision-Maker may also consider the investigative report, including any Party’s written response to the investigative report, all relevant evidence presented at the hearing, and the audio recording and/or transcript of the hearing.
- The Appeal Decision-Maker may consist of one to three faculty and staff members.
- The Appeal Decision-Maker will issue a written determination of appeal, which will describe the result of the appeal and the rationale for the result.
- The Title IX Coordinator will provide the written determination of appeal simultaneously to the parties.
The result of the appeal is final.
Retaliation
Retaliation is prohibited.
- A report of alleged Retaliation may be made to the Title IX Coordinator in person, by mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail.
- Any Responsible Employee who receives a report of alleged Retaliation must promptly report the alleged Retaliation to the Title IX Coordinator.
- Alleges of Retaliation may be investigated and adjudicated under the Sexual Misconduct Prohibition Policy and/or the Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment.